00:00
00:00
ShadenLines
Artist in various media (mostly traditional), craftsman & general DIYer. I make no guarantee of regular posting--work will go up as circumstances permit.

Pablo NeckBone Washington @ShadenLines

Volkswagen Beetle

DIYer

various/school of hard knocks

right behind you

Joined on 2/20/23

Level:
12
Exp Points:
1,368 / 1,600
Exp Rank:
50,790
Vote Power:
5.37 votes
Art Scouts
1
Rank:
Civilian
Global Rank:
> 100,000
Blams:
0
Saves:
7
B/P Bonus:
0%
Whistle:
Normal
Trophies:
2
Medals:
4
Supporter:
1y 9m 15d

a moral dilemma

Posted by ShadenLines - March 28th, 2025


Two days ago I made the mistake of buying a few things to read. In my defense I had a reason (need info about truck mods)...but still.


Picked up the reading habit when I was little, so you know I'm incorrigible at this point. I'll try not to make the textwall too high...


Got a most interesting article in American Affairs...morbidly interesting, to a confirmed declinist like myself. It is about the US military, specifically the ingrained problems that plague it. I already knew a few things about the situation, i.e. the consistent failure to meet recruiting goals & the inability to procure major equipment (ships, fighter planes, etc.) while staying under budget. But the article goes into some depth, & I gotta be honest: I knew things were bad, but I had no idea they were this bad.


A few quotes (edited for brevity):


  • "The most striking aspect of this situation is that every major branch of the U.S. military is in crisis at the same time. ...All major branches have serious sustainment & maintenance issues due to a combination of aging equipment & general rust inside the industrial base. All major branches are arguably also facing real problems trying to adapt & update institutionalized twentieth-century thinking to experiences from twenty-first century battlefields..."
  • "Though it's a common refrain to bemoan waste & fraud inside the DoD budget, the simple reality is that a fifty-plus-year-old aircraft carrier hull like the USS Nimitz cannot be maintained forever. The carrier, just like every other military platform, requires somewhat regular replacement due to...wear over time. The U.S. military now has a massive backlog of such aging platforms, & there is simply not enough money to replace them."
  • "...a costly, sprawling 'solutions industry' of nongovernmental organizations dedicated to servicing it. Inside this industry, 'policy wonks' of all kinds find ample opportunity to hone their craft: writing proposals for reforming submarine depot maintenance here, or reducing cruise missile overhead costs there. Though all of this activity is...impressive, the...reality today is that this 'solutions industry' inside D.C. is doing about as well at tackling the military crisis as California's sprawling NGO ecosystem is at ending that state's homelessness problem."
  • "The underlying issue that Navy leadership has to deal with is that the main scenario the Navy is supposed to prepare for--a kinetic war against China--is actually completely nonsensical... The Pentagon itself estimates that China's shipbuilding capacity today is roughly 230 times greater than America's. Many Japanese...most notably Adm. Yamamoto himself, were skeptical that any...tactics & strategy could make up for the gulf in industrial potential between Imperial Japan & America, & yet that advantage was an order of magnitude less than the advantage enjoyed by China today; it was far closer to ten to one than a hundred to one."
  • "Today, the Navy is fairly candid about the fact that it lacks enough vessels to escort sealift ships across the Pacific. For its part, Military Sealift Command is equally candid...that there aren't enough ships to actually resupply American forces anyway. ...Pacific wargame scenarios regularly have the American side running out of precision weapons weeks or days into the fighting, with almost no capacity to replenish stocks."
  • "If one considers that the stated purpose of the Navy today is to build ships & win wars, the Constellation program is a disaster in the making. If, however, one considers that the actual purpose of the Navy is to project an image of credibility, then non-finalized, concurrent, ever-shifting designs that never get done & always seem to be just around the corner, just waiting for the inclusion of some 'game changer' bit of technology, is actually rational & reasonable."
  • "...the entire U.S. military today is mired in the same deadlock between an...unfeasible 'official' institutional purpose & the implicit demands placed on these institutions: the need to maintain ideological credibility, projecting an image of strength vis-a-vis any peer competitor. The suicide epidemic inside the U.S. Army is [an example] among many with regard to the costs of maintaining this front: it is no coincidence that the most suicide-prone units inside the Army today are the armor units. ... Using increasingly ancient equipment that is prone to...breakdown, with spotty & sometimes insufficient supplies of spare parts, the soldiers inside armor units work truly nightmarish hours. This has...effects on these soldiers' families, as well as their own mental & physical health."
  • "The Air Force is saddled with maintaining bomber airframes whose production lines ended decades ago; the Army is cannibalizing its own motor pools & driving its own soldiers to quit the service or take their own lives in order to keep appearances going. The Navy now has fewer than 300 total vessels in the fleet, but it is still being given the same amount of forward presence missions as when it had twice that number."


I could've included quite a bit more, but you get the idea. I knew our armed forces were SNAFU...I did not know they were at TARFU level. They may not have gone FUBAR but if the article is legit--I'm pretty sure it is--then they will degrade to that level, soon enough.


Now here's the problem: I've learned all of the above (&, previously, a few related factoids) while being in intermittent contact with a friend of mine. He's in the service, is a mechanic of some sort, & will be sent to a region that isn't hot but probably will get hot within the next two years. That much I can reveal here. My friend is not stupid; he knows any weaknesses within his department (for lack of a better word). However with all due respect to him, I don't think he is aware of most of the above info. Until I started with my move, I had time to research these things here & there. He doesn't have that luxury; in the military you usually have a job to do. My first instinct was to xerox the article & send the copy to him, but then I had second thoughts. This intel may affect his chances of survival if war should break out...but if I give it to him it could increase his stress, which could impact his ability to function while in an already stressful situation. So:


Should I give my friend the info, or should I keep silent?



I welcome any & all constructive replies. Please explain the reasoning behind your answer, & thank you for reading.


Tags:

1

Comments

If anyone doesn't know the acronyms near the bottom of the post:

SNAFU = Situation Normal: All Fucked Up
TARFU = Things Are Really Fucked Up
FUBAR = Fucked Up Beyond All Repair

Those are the three levels of fucked-upness.

hm... interesting, i think i told you before that americans were better at propaganda than they are at actually making weapons. I would keep silent about it to your friend, since it's already too hard, but i keep silent in not so serious matter like for example a brazilian artist trying to do a manga. Also thanks for the explanation of the "fucked-upnesss" acronyms, i was going to google that

I've kept things others have told me to myself more than once...that was the second thought I had. Every so often people want to tell me all about themselves for some reason, though I rarely ever ask (& don't need to know, more often than not).

"Silence is a friend who will never betray you." - old Sicilian proverb

Thinking I should hand-letter that at some point...

As for "Americans are...", that's a bit vague. We're great at manufacturing small arms, that I guarantee you--especially these days. Our firearms industry has been around for over 1.5 centuries now; the skillsets & overall knowledge have been going up the whole time. In terms of military weaponry, however, the situation is complicated....

We COULD make great fighter jets, tanks, APCs, etc. if we wanted to, but defense contractor firms always charge at max level when drawing up manufacturing deals with the government. Profiteering is nothing new; there were instances of that during our Civil War! They make their ships & other things so costly that our armed forces cannot afford to buy what they need for adequate force projection...thus the maintenance of aging vehicles & ships, as outlined above. Congress is also to blame as it has not been fiscally responsible since forever...that story has been told many times. Books have been written about it. I own one but haven't read it yet. Congressmen like to spend like drunken sailors on their pet projects (because it helps them stay in office), which leaves less money for other functions the government needs to fulfill. Social Security is slated to run out of money by 2035 if I'm not mistaken...not completely, but the way it's going, if nothing is done then by 2035 it will only be able to cover maybe 79% of all retirement & disability claims at most.

Haha if hes in the military then he knows. Especially if hes a mechanic. Everyone knows how nightmarish the upkeep is on all US armor and vehicles. When we ditched the middle east and gave, i think it was isis, a bunch of shit left behind nobody cared. They posted a picture of their "army", a whole bunch of humvees, helicopter, trucks, guns... the funny part is that all of that shit was gonna be unusable soon anyway, they dont have mechanics! Especially in such an unfriendly environment to mechanical things like the desert. US equipment needs fixing so frequently, and its always so difficult, its a wonder we even have a military.

Hmmm..."everyone knows", eh? Were you in the service? You don't have to give specifics if you don't want to; a simple yes or no will suffice.

@ShadenLines .......nnnooooooooo...

"I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you"...okay, got it.

so..what would be the point of giving this information to your friend? what changes could he affect change in given his (seemingly) low spot on the totem pole? as a negative as you mention it would add stress, but best case, how would this help his experience or survivability at all? It almost seems like giving him an article about being aware of military rations, they have carcinogens you need to be aware of, but he's out in the middle of nowhere with not much choice in the way of sustenance...

doesn't the US have a sh*tload of billion dollar destroyer assets dating back to early post WWII, that haven't really been used tactically until the past two years? why don't government defense agencies just make the weapons and platforms themselves? doesn't the government also have the ultimate say who contractors can sell their product to (i.e. other partner nations) and can't they just tell them to kick dust?

I suppose there's also a sh*tload of bureaucracy that goes into modernizing weapons (namely the labor and material acquisition that goes into) that might not be. I think I read an article the other day that China is ahead in AI & unmanned drone technology which could be the future flavor of warfare

what do you think of Elon's approach to DOGE'ing the government sector ostensibly in aid of reducing government waste?

Your input came after the cow wandered off the pasture but thanks anyway. I decided not to tell him, basically for the same reasons you stated. He's a mechanic, not a high-level bureaucrat in the Department of Defense or anywhere even close. The info would either make him worry or he'd just ignore it, because that's all he could do.

Re your other questions on military procurement of their toys: I don't know. Have talked to more than a few servicemen...never found a source within the government bureaucracies that make such decisions. The closest I've ever come to that was a guy who was previously in intelligence analysis in the Air Force.

As for the DOGE thing...*smh* I am all in favor of reducing government wastage but Musk's whole deal is corruption, not trimming excess spending & keeping what's necessary. I'm firmly convinced his DOGE setup is for crippling Tesla's competition in the States.

If there is even a slight possibility that knowledge of this type would help your friend in any way, then you should tell them. At this point you might have made your decision already, but that's my two cents.

All things considered, I don't think it would help him at all. If I told him then it may or may not stress him out, but that's all it would do. Without going into specifics, this friend is stationed on a vehicle with lots of very big guns & defensive technology all over it. Said vehicle will be surrounded by other well-armed & manned vehicles. He figures he'll _probably_ be okay.

@ShadenLines Well, it seems you have made your decision. But my statement still stands. If telling him won't really help in any way, then might as well not. I hope your friend ends up being safe after all.

I appreciate your thought, Zi...would've appreciated it no matter which way I decided.

A followup for @LordofRealty - It was the Taliban who got all the hardware we left behind in that FUBARed withdrawal from Afghanistan. (Note to Biden's former cabinet members: Smooth move, Ex-Lax. 🙄) Admittedly it may not have been that bad a screwup _if_ our people knew the vehicles & weaponry all had expired warranties, but still...it made us look foolish. You cannot afford to be or look incompetent when you're playing the great game.

ISIS & the Taliban don't get along, if memory serves. The thing is the Talibs are strictly a Pashtun/Afghanistan outfit while ISIS isn't restricted to any one state or territory...last I heard, some of their guys set up bases of ops in northern Africa, i.e. Sudan & Morocco. Wouldn't be a surprise if they have at least one sleeper cell within our borders.